Disagreement Strategies in Rebuttal of Australian Parliamentary Debate at 5 Vocational High School Surabaya

This item is published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Herdiana, Denisa Dinda (2018) Disagreement Strategies in Rebuttal of Australian Parliamentary Debate at 5 Vocational High School Surabaya. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Preview

Text
DenisaDindaHerdiana_A73214074.pdf
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This thesis examines about disagreement strategies especially in rebuttal of Australian Parliamentary Debate. The researcher uses the debaters of 5 Vocational High School Surabaya as the data source. She also analyze about the context of situation in this thesis. Many previous researchers have been analyzed about disagreement in different fields such as, Mulyani analyzed disagreement in first presidential debate between Barrack Obama and McCain (2011), Arofa analyzed disagreement in Meet the Fockers Movie (2015), and Rohmah analyzed disagreement in doctorate classroom at the State University of Malang (2005).The researcher brings Locher’s theory to analyze the disagreement and uses Hymes’s theory to analyze the context of situation. The methodology of this research is qualitative because this research analyze about the textual data. In addition, the researcher acts as human instrument and she also uses some supporting instruments like video recorder and field notes. In data collection, the researcher takes the data from the debaters of 5 Vocational High School Surabaya when they do a sparring and she collects the data in 4 weeks. As the result, the first is about type of disagreement strategies that used by the positive and the negative team is the use of hedges. The second is about the motion that frequently appears in disagreement is the motion about Government should not fund the reconstrution in areas that prone to disaster in the fourth week. The last is about the context of situation applied by each speaker. The researcher here only brings four features of situation such as participants, topic, setting and key. For get the result of the context situations, we need to clarify the data one by one and it can take from the field notes.