This item is published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Rohman, Nor (2016) THE EFFECT OF LECTURER’S ELICITING TECHNIQUE TOWARD STUDENTS’ ACTIVENESS IN SPEAKING CLASS ACTIVITY OF SECOND SEMESTERAT ISLAMIC STATE UNIVERSITY SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
|
Text
Cover.pdf Download (552kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Abstrak.pdf Download (145kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Daftar Isi.pdf Download (354kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bab 1.pdf Download (910kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bab 2.pdf Download (219kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bab 3.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bab 4.pdf Download (286kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bab 5.pdf Download (248kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (254kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This research was done in second semester of English Department. In the semester, the speaking class named Everyday Communication. The goal of this class is to improve their speaking ability, especially for daily communication. Therefore, the lecturer should be able to facilitate and expand students’ opportunity to practice speaking because this is the very beginning step to build up the students’ confidence before stepping to the next speaking class called Speaking for Group activities. For this reason, this thesis analyzes the lecturer’s eliciting technique in Every day Communication class, UIN SunanAmpel Surabaya. In this research, the research was done to knoweliciting techniques that used by the lecturer and the effect of eliciting technique used by the lecturer for the students in Everyday Communication class. This research used qualitative method because the researcher started from the theory of the Eliciting technique to encourage the students. Furthermore, data was collected through the transcription of the class and interview from the lecturer and the students.The eliciting techniques that the lecturer used are; Polar Closed Question, Closed Question, Open Question, and Socratic Question, while the effects of eliciting techniques used by the lecturer in “Everyday Communication Class” are in the form of thier responses and actively responded by the students. However, responses of the students were in the form of short answer. As matter of fact, Polar closed question led students to answer in form of “yes/no” response. In addition, for closed question, the students’ responses are based on the factual information that they knew. Furthermore, in open question, here the students have more opportunity to participate and Socratic question is one to lead students to realize or discover something. Moreover, in the eliciting techniques that students exactly have more opportunity was not maximize by the lecturer.As example, the lecturer just used once Socratic question and none of catalytic question. For this reason, the lecturer must be able to create suitable question with the student’s level in order that, the students will easily understand the question and engage the opportunity of learning.
Statistic
Downloads from over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Subjects: | Pendidikan > Bahasa Inggris | ||||||
| Keywords: | Eliciting Techniques; Students activeness and Speaking Class | ||||||
| Divisions: | Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Rahman Nur | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 08 Sep 2016 04:50 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 08 Sep 2016 04:57 | ||||||
| URI: | http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/id/eprint/13754 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
