حجية حديث الاحد في العقيدة: دراسة مقارنة بين أراء محمد ناصر الدين الألباني والدكتور يوسف القرضاوي

This item is published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Hasyimie, Khoirul Anam Ahmad (2009) حجية حديث الاحد في العقيدة: دراسة مقارنة بين أراء محمد ناصر الدين الألباني والدكتور يوسف القرضاوي. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Text
Khoirul Anam Ahmad Hasyimie_E53205005.pdf
Download (3MB)

Official URL: http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/32416

Abstract

The authority of Hadith as a source of Islamic teachings related to the issue of faith, law, morals, and so forth have become Muslims confidence. However, the dynamics of the development discourse of thought about the Hadith, are often fulfilled with the emergence of doubt and even the rejection of the authority of the Hadith as a source of the teachings of Islam after the Qur'an. Imam asy-Syafi'i mentions the existence of groups munkir as- Sunna or inkar as-Sunna. They are groups that reject the Hadith as a whole, or reject the Hadith that is not supported by the description of Quran verses or reject the Hadith by the Categorical Ahad. Apart from the controversy about the claim inkarus Sunna or not, discourse on the status and the authority of Hadith ahad as hujjah in faith need to review the issue further. This issue is important, many problems in the faith such as the confidence of grave punishment, the question munkar and nakir, well (al Haudh), intercession of Rasulullah, the emergence of Da1Jal and the descent of Isa al-Masih, and so forth, are often sued because of alleged the Hadith as ahad. Meanwhile, there are claims that the scholars agree; the Hadiths Ahad can't be used in the faith and supernatural things. In fact, there is stressed that the law prohi bited the Hadiths Ahad as the basic in the problem of confidence or faith. The emergence of the categorization discourse of Hadith into mutawatir and Ahad, influenced at least two things, first, the problem of faith, the influence of scholars debate about some issues in the science of Ka/am and philosophy of thought. In some perspective of Hadith scholars the categorization is needed to avoid unbeliever of Hadith from a group that ghuluw (extreme) against those who still hesitate to receive the Hadith Ahad as an arguments in the issue of faith. Second, the problem of Jurisprudence, the debate about the authority of the Hadith Ahad as zhaniyah tsubut in eliminate the law that clause in Quran, that has the status qath'iyuts tsubut. According to Muhammad Nashir al Din al Albany, difference between mutawatir and Ahad in the problem of faith and law is falsehood. During the Hadith is Shahih, we must accept. Meanwhile, according to DR. Yusuf Al-Qaradhawy, the debate about the authority of the Hadith Ahad as hujjah in the faith there are two main things, first, whether the Hadith Ahad (shahih) given knowledge and confidence, or he just Zhan rajih? Second, whether the proposition can be a source Zhan determination faith problem or something that's to be sure and very convincing?